Bounced Cheques in Kuwait: Elements, Penalty, and Defence Strategies
28 July 2026

A practical guide to the offence of issuing a cheque without sufficient funds under Kuwaiti law: the elements of the offence, the penalty, the effect of settlement, and the main lines of defence.

Under Kuwaiti law a cheque is an instrument of payment that stands in place of cash, which is why the legislator surrounded it with criminal protection. This guide explains when the offence actually arises, when it does not, and which defences may be raised.

Note: This content is for general guidance. Assessing any particular position requires reviewing the case file, the cheque itself, and the bank's non-payment certificate.

1) The Legal Nature of a Cheque

The Kuwaiti Commercial Code treats a cheque as an instrument of payment due on sight, not an instrument of credit. That characterisation has a fundamental consequence: as a general rule, side agreements to postpone presentation carry no weight, because a cheque falls due the moment it is presented.

Rule: Characterising the cheque as an instrument of payment is the very basis of its criminal protection, and it is what distinguishes it from a bill of exchange or a promissory note.

2) Elements of the Offence

  • Material element: issuing a cheque that satisfies the formal requirements, followed by the absence of available funds when it is presented.
  • Mental element: criminal intent, that is the drawer's knowledge that funds were insufficient at issuance or at maturity, and the direction of their will to that outcome.
  • Subject matter: a document containing the legal particulars of a cheque; the absence of an essential particular may strip it of that character.
Important: Negating criminal intent is among the strongest defences, particularly where it is established that the drawer believed funds were available, or that the cheque was given as security rather than as payment.

3) Forms of the Offence

  • Issuing a cheque with no existing, withdrawable funds behind it.
  • Withdrawing the funds wholly or partly after issuance so that the cheque can no longer be cashed.
  • Instructing the bank to stop payment outside the cases permitted by law.
  • Drawing or signing the cheque in a manner deliberately designed to prevent it from being honoured.

4) The Penalty

The offence is a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment, a fine, or one of the two, depending on the applicable provision, the circumstances, and the court's assessment. A criminal judgment does not prevent the beneficiary from pursuing the value of the cheque through the civil courts.

Legal basis: the provisions of the Kuwaiti Penal Code concerning cheque offences, read together with the cheque provisions of the Commercial Code.

5) Civil Track vs Criminal Track

Criminal track

Begins with a complaint before the competent authority, accompanied by the original cheque and the bank's certificate of non-payment. Its object is to impose a penalty on the drawer.

Civil track

A claim for the value of the cheque together with interest and costs. It may be pursued independently or alongside the criminal case as a civil claimant.

Advice: The choice of track is not a formality. The criminal track applies faster pressure towards payment, while the civil track suits cases where the underlying debt or the validity of the instrument is genuinely disputed.

6) Effect of Waiver and Settlement

Payment and settlement have a decisive practical effect in cheque cases. A waiver by the beneficiary after their right has been satisfied bears on the course of the case and on the court's assessment of the penalty, and may bring the case to an end or mitigate it depending on the stage reached and the applicable provision.

Practical guidance: Record the settlement in writing, state clearly whether it covers principal, interest and costs, and take back the original cheque on payment.

7) Principal Defences

  • Absence of criminal intent: for example proving funds existed at issuance, or the drawer's good faith.
  • Failure of a formal requirement: a missing essential particular that deprives the document of the character of a cheque.
  • Cheque given as security, not payment: a precise defence requiring strong evidence and documents; its assessment rests with the court.
  • Extinction of the case: through waiver, settlement, or lapse of time under the applicable rules.
  • Absence of capacity: where the signature is attributed to another, or was made by someone without signing authority.
  • Nullity of procedure: such as material defects in service or investigation.

8) Practical Scenarios

Scenario: a cheque drawn as security

  • Gather everything establishing the nature of the relationship: the contract, correspondence, account statements.
  • Show that the cheque was not delivered in settlement of a debt then due.
  • Remember this is a defence on the merits, assessed by the court, so it must rest on evidence rather than assertion.

Scenario: a judgment rendered in absentia

  • Verify that the judgment was validly served.
  • File the objection within its time limit.
  • If that period has lapsed, move to appeal where the judgment is open to it.
Professional reminder: Speed is decisive in cheque cases; procedural time limits are short and missing one may close the door to challenge for good.
Facing a bounced cheque, whether as beneficiary or as drawer? Contact Attorney Meshari Obaid Al-Enezi — Yumnaak Law Firm — to assess your position and plan the right next step.

Need Legal Advice?

The Yumnaak Law Firm team is ready to help with trusted expertise.

Book Appointment Contact Us

All rights reserved to Yumnaak Law Firm 2026 YUMNAAK LAW FIRM