Kuwait's Security Camera Law: Who Must Install, and Where Is It Prohibited?
29 July 2026

The facilities required to install security cameras are exhaustively defined in thirteen categories, expandable only by a Council of Ministers decision. A practical guide for anyone served with a violation report, and for the places where filming is prohibited.

Many businesses receive demands to install surveillance cameras when they fall outside the scope of the legal obligation altogether. The difference between a genuine obligation and a demand with no statutory basis is what decides a violation report.

The conclusion up front: the list of covered facilities is exhaustive, and it may be expanded only by a decision of the Council of Ministers — not by a ministerial decision, and not by an administrative circular.

1) The Source of the Obligation — Article (2)

Article (2) imposes three cumulative obligations on the owners of covered facilities and those responsible for managing them:

  • Installing security surveillance cameras.
  • Operating them throughout the day, without interruption.
  • Maintaining a central control room to manage and monitor them.
A precise point: the obligation rests on the owner and the person responsible for management together. Determining where responsibility actually lies is a question answered by the management or lease agreement and the allocation of authority within it.

2) Covered Facilities — Article (1)

Article (1) defines "facilities" exhaustively, in thirteen categories:

  1. Hotels and hotel apartments
  2. Commercial complexes
  3. Cooperative societies
  4. Residential complexes
  5. Banks
  6. Money exchange outlets
  7. Gold and jewellery shops
  8. Sporting and cultural clubs
  9. Youth centres
  10. Shopping and entertainment centres
  11. Hospitals and clinics
  12. Warehouses and stores holding valuables or hazardous materials
  13. Fuel stations
Why exhaustiveness matters: anything falling outside these categories is not subject to the obligation by force of the statute itself. A consultancy office, a workshop, or a small retail unit, for instance, is not a "facility" within the meaning of the provision.

3) How the List May Lawfully Expand

Article (1) closes the definition with an open clause: "and such other facilities as may be designated by a decision of the Council of Ministers upon the proposal of the Minister".

That clause lays down a single route for expansion, subject to two conditions together:

  • The instrument: a decision issued by the Council of Ministers exclusively.
  • The procedure: upon the proposal of the competent Minister.
The direct legal consequence: expansion is not valid by a decision of the Minister of Interior alone, nor by a circular from the General Department of Security Systems, nor by an administrative notice. Anyone required to install while falling outside the thirteen categories is entitled to be met with a published Council of Ministers decision covering their activity.

4) Prohibited Locations — Article (9)

Even inside a covered facility, installation is not unrestricted. Article (9) prohibits placing cameras in:

  • Areas designated for residence or sleeping.
  • Physiotherapy rooms.
  • Changing rooms.
  • Toilets.
  • Women's institutes and salons.
  • Any location that conflicts with personal privacy.
A double-edged effect: this provision cuts both ways — it protects a facility against a demand to install in a prohibited location, and it opens the door to liability for anyone who has installed a camera in one.

5) The Position of Government Entities

Government entities do not fall within the definition in Article (1). Nonetheless, the General Department of Security Systems supplies state facilities with security systems in its capacity as the competent technical authority.

The essential distinction: the obligation of a government entity here is administrative in nature, not criminal — a characterisation with real consequences when liability and sanction are examined.

6) Responding to a Violation Report

Where a violation report is issued for failure to install, the defence follows a logical sequence:

  1. Characterise the activity: does it genuinely fall within one of the thirteen categories on the strict wording, rather than by analogy?
  2. Demand the basis of the obligation: if the activity is outside the list, the demand requires a published Council of Ministers decision. Ask for its number and date of publication.
  3. Check the addressee: is the report directed at the owner or at the person responsible for management, and is that capacity correct under the contracts?
  4. Check the location: does the demand extend to a place prohibited by Article (9)?
  5. Review procedure: the validity of service and the period allowed for rectification.
The strongest defence: falling outside the exhaustive definition. Arguing about installation details before settling whether the statute applies to the activity at all concedes the strongest point in the file.

7) Practical Checklist

If you are within the list

  • Install the system and operate it around the clock.
  • Maintain a central control room.
  • Avoid the locations prohibited by Article (9).
  • Document maintenance contracts and continuity of operation.

If you are outside the list

  • Do not concede the violation.
  • Request the basis of the obligation in writing, with the decision number.
  • Keep a copy of the report and all correspondence.
  • Consult a lawyer before the grievance period expires.
Professional reminder: an early written response requesting the statutory basis builds a stronger file than silence followed by litigation later.
Received a violation report concerning security cameras, or need an assessment of whether the law applies to your activity? Contact Attorney Meshari Obaid Al-Enezi — Yumnaak Law Firm.

Need Legal Advice?

The Yumnaak Law Firm team is ready to help with trusted expertise.

Book Appointment Contact Us

All rights reserved to Yumnaak Law Firm 2026 YUMNAAK LAW FIRM